This entry was an inspiration for my ISP presentation. In reality, my ISP has been an analysis of a controversial topic (pro con handguns). Debaters argue such controversial topics on a regular basis and try to find a resolution based on research. I sat in on a few debates to see how they are structured and how timing works. This will be used for my "mini-debates" that will be held during my ISP to show how hard it is to come to a resolution over such controversial issues/topics.
I learnt about rebuttal speeches and how one side will prepare a speech that will be countered with another. The judge will base victory of of whoever seems to have control over the situation and has better arguments to support their side of the case. At any point, a debater can ask the other side for proof of the evidence presented to ensure that there isn't any fake data presented.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
March 2017
Categories |